Archive for: November 2006
November 25, 2006
 E minus 2 days and counting.
I’ve said it before and I’m gonna say it again: Damn, but it’s gettin’ crowded around here! The front page of the Freeps pretty much summed it all up today with the headline (or should I say punchline), “Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the London-North-Centre celebrity political run-off . . . We mean byelection . . .”
It’s starting to seem like everybody — yes, every-damn-body — has popped in lately. Don’t believe me? Check this checklist:
- Belinda “I’m smarter now, I’m a brunette” Stronach
- Grit bench-warming honcho Bill Graham
- Ralph Goodale
- Kenny “oh my God, they killed daycare; YOU BASTARDS!” Dryden
- Highway Rob Rae
- Gerard Kennedy
- Stephane “no, she’s not related” Dion
- Martha Hall Findlay
- Scott Brison
- Igggy
- Smirkin’ Jack
- Howard Hampton
- Alexa McDonough
- Jim Flaherty
- Stockwell “does this wetsuit make my butt look big?” Day
- Diane Finley
- Jane “where the hell did they dig me up?” Bigelow
- Garth Nader
This is getting out of control. 🙄 Trudeau 2.0’s supposed to be putting in an appearance too, before it’s done. You’ll have to just read the rest for yourselves; all this celebrity strafing is giving me a headache…
The Freeps
What are all these people doing here?
Why we didn’t endorse candidates
May offers up economic strategy
 Crack a cold one, throw Flight of the Valkyries on the turntable and enjoy the spectacle of all the soaring swine. That’s right boys and girls, Rick Mercer said something with which I am in total agreement. He actually manages to take all the criticism of Harper’s stance with China and, in what I must admit is a very Canadian fashion, put it in just the right light.
No, I haven’t been drinking. Well, not that much anyway. Here, see for yourself and see what you think.
November 24, 2006
E minus 3 days and counting.
This weekend is going to be absolutely nuts, I can just feel it. As if politics a’ la Grit wasn’t enough to leave most people with and “eeeeewww… I need a shower” feeling, the Librano$ seem to have taken up bushwhacking as their latest little vote-getting dog & pony show:
Amanda Nielsen was just going out for a walk with her dog and her month-old baby.
The next thing she knew, a Liberal handler was taking her dog away, London-North-Centre Liberal candidate Glen Pearson was looking into her stroller and half a dozen photographers were taking pictures of former Ontario premier and federal Liberal leadership candidate Bob Rae.
If that’s not an argument for legalizing mace, I don’t know what is. Meanwhile, Megan Walker, the Dipper Dumbass that she is, came in as the hands-down winner of my WTF!? Of The Day award with her loopy assertion that only the NDP are addressing the war in Afghanistan:
 “The NDP is the only party talking about the situation in Afghanistan in this byelection,” Walker said at the London Peace Gardens.
“It’s astonishing to me when there has been 42 deaths of Canadian soldiers, we’re at war and not hearing a word from the other candidates.”
Hey, Maggie; I don’t know about anybody else, but I know what Haskett’s position on the war is and I think most other people do too. By the way, calling over and over again for our Armed Forces to tuck tail and run is NOT “addressing the war!” Twit. 🙄
Tory Dianne Haskett continued to toot the law-and-order horn, following PM Harpers lead in pointing to the Amazing Vanishing Ahmed Moalin-Mohamed as a perfect example of why changes are needed to the justice system, PDQ.
And here’s the links:
The Freeps
‘Wiser’ Grit Pearson says he’s ready for tough slog
Walker says only NDP tackling Afghan war issue
Haskett highlights tougher bail
Candidates debate world poverty
This hour — or less — has three candidates
I don’t know about anyone else out there but, when I was growing up, one thing that mom, dad, grandma, grandpa and just about everyone else told me as often as needed was: “be careful what you wish for; you just might get it.” I’ve somehow managed to avoid forgetting that most of the time.
It seems, however, that this here kid either forgot it or never learned it in the first place:
Joe Mroszczyk, president of the College Republicans at Boston University, admits he set out to stir up a hornet’s nest when he came up with the idea of offering a whites-only scholarship at the school. But he got a little more buzz than he bargained for.
In deed he did. The whole world seems up in arms. Why, you ask? Ooooohhh… little Joey’s been a very naughty boy, indeed. Joey set up one of those little ethnic scholarships for students to compete for. In order to qualify, applicants need to have a cumulative grade point average of 3.2 or higher and they have to write two essays.
What’s the big deal? All kinds of ethnic scholarships exist and have existed for years now. Organizations like the United Negro College Fund , the National Hispanic Recognition Scholarship , the Asian & Pacific Islander American Scholarship Fund , the Asian American Scholarship Fund , and a whole bunch of others. So why the hell is everybody pinching a loaf over Joey’s little $250 that’s up for grabs?
Well, it’s simple. To qualify for the United Negro College Fund, you need to be black. Oops, make that Hyphenated-American. To qualify for the National Hispanic Recognition Scholarship , you need to be at least one quarter Hispanic. To qualify for Joey’s little jackpot, you need to be… at least 25% WHITE! 😯 That’s right: it’s the “Caucasian Achievement and Recognition Scholarship.” If you don’t have a honkey on your family woodpile, don’t bother coming out. The reactions have been pretty predictable, with one exception:
 Outside a university gymnasium last night, 2005 graduate Bryan Williams, 23, of Malden, condemned the scholarship as insensitive. “I understand, in order for minorities to be equal, they need to be treated equally if you are receiving a scholarship,” he said. “But we spent how many years being held back, and now we are trying to catch up. It’s a slap in the face.”
[…]
Karla Mercado, 19, a sophomore from Guam who is majoring in biomedical engineering and is on a scholarship for Asian-Pacific Islanders, had no problem with the scholarship. “I know some clubs that offer scholarships for certain racial backgrounds, so I see no problem with it,” she said.
I guess all those job postings that say “we don’t hire white men women and visible minorities are encouraged to apply” are fine and dandy but, turn that logic around and the sky will fall.
Yessiree, bigots can rest safe and sound in the good ol’ US of A… just as long as they only bash white folks. 🙄
Come to think of it, there was something else that dad always used to tell me: if you can’t take it, don’t dish it out.
A flip o’ the lid to Small Dead Animals.
 [It seems worth noting that this post took two days to write. I wanted to think about it first -Dennis]
I like Steve; really, I do. Everybody who comes by here knows that. But sometimes, just sometimes, he leaves me shaking my head, wondering “just what the [bleep] is he thinking??” This is one of those times.
 As most of you already know already, HMPM Harper basically put Ping and Pong on either side of the third rail of Canadian politics yesterday when he rose in the Commons to take what could well be the biggest political risk that we have seen any politician gamble on since… well, I can’t think of when. Just what did he have to say that could be so risky? Well, amongst other things:
“Mr. Speaker, tomorrow the Bloc Quebecois will present the House with an unusual request that we here at the federal Parliament define the Quebecois nation.
“As a consequence, with the support of the government and with the support of our party, I will be putting on the Notice Paper later today the following motion:
“That this House recognize that the Quebecois form a nation within a united Canada.
“Once again, the leader of the Bloc and his separatist friends are not concerned with defining who Quebecers are but rather what they want them to become, a separate country.
“The separatists do not need the Parliament of Canada to define what is meant by the sociological termination. My preference has been well known. I believe that this is not the job of the federal Parliament. It is the job of the legislature of Quebec, but the Bloc Quebecois has asked us to define this and perhaps that is a good thing, because it reminds us that all Canadians have a say in the future of this country.
“Having been asked by the Bloc to define the Quebecois, we must take a position. Our position is clear. Do the Quebecois form a nation within Canada? The answer is yes. Do the Quebecois form an independent nation? The answer is no and the answer will always be no, because Quebecers of all political persuasions, from Cartier and Laurier to Mulroney and Trudeau, have led this country and millions like them of all political persuasions have helped to build it.
“With their English- and French-speaking fellow citizens and people drawn from all nationalities of this earth, they have been part of making this country what it is, the greatest country in the world.
“To millions more who live in a dangerous and dividing world, this country is a shining example of the harmony and unity to which all peoples are capable and to which all humanity should aspire.
“I say to my federalist colleagues and I also say to the separatist side that we here will do what we must, what our forefathers have always done to preserve this country, Canada, strong, united, independent and free.”
 Call me whatever you like (and I’m sure some of you can think of plenty), but this whole idea gives me nebulous but implacable sense of unease. It’s like hearing the sound of a distant siren and finding yourself wondering, for no good reason, if your house is on fire.
Sound silly? Fine. It feels silly; but it still isn’t going away. That’s why I’m trying to take as much time as I can to try to digest this before shooting my mouth off, instead of just shooting from the lip as usual.
On the one hand, such a declaration smacks of capitulation to the PQ, Blocheads and the other motley assortments that would gladly rip my country apart. But if that’s so, then why is Gilles Duceppe in such a piss-up-a-rope mood over it? See what I mean:
 The glum look on Bloc leader Gilles Duceppe’s red face was also worth the price of a Commons admission. His chance to boost Quebec resentment against the Liberals and put Harper in a deadly python squeeze over the Quebec nation question in the next election evaporated minutes after the prime minister started speaking.
Could it have anything to do with the fact that this won’t actually change anything, legally or constitutionally speaking? After taking a day to step back and get a good, long sniff of this, I’m more and more coming to the same conclusion that many other observers have already come to. The emerging consensus is that this is a move worthy of a master chessplayer. In one stroke, Harper has taken some wind out of the Bloc’s sails:
Bloc Leader Gilles Duceppe says his party will vote in favour of the motion, which calls the Quebecois a nation within a united Canada.
…beaten the Librano$ to the punch:
The grim face of interim leader Bill Graham and sagging shoulders among Liberals even as they struggled to their feet to give Harper a standing ovation told the story of a party beaten to the punch and whacked in the head.
…and shown the Dippers to be incapable of taking a stand on just about anything:
NDP Leader Jack Layton said Wednesday his caucus would support both the Tory and BQ motions.
All in all, not a bad day. Some people have suggested one possibly huge fly in the ointment, however:
Good for a snicker, but not likely to happen. Yes, this may piss off a few people in the West but, with all three federalist parties on board, any protest vote has no place to go.
All in all, I still haven’t made up my mind about this yet. But at least I feel a little better about it than I did 48hrs ago. One thing is for certain: this is either a political master stroke worthy of some of history’s greats, or Ping and Pong are toast. There will be no middle ground on this one.
November 23, 2006
E minus 4 days and counting.
It continues. The Freeps — wisely, in my opinion — chose to water down CAP foghorn Will Arlow’s little suggestion, made to CCH students yesterday and Lizzie “forty whacks is fine if it’s not a tree” May got back into the fray by trying to hop on Meg Walker’s women’s issues hobbyhorse.
“The best place for a woman at the cabinet table is as prime minister,” May told a crowd of about 200 people, gathered by the group Women Our Votes Count, to prolonged applause.
Interesting line of thought for the leader of a party that’s never elected a single MP. 😕
Walker, meanwhile, was out courting the homeless vote. 🙄 No, I didn’t mistype that. She was out courting the homeless vote with er, ahem… ambiguous success:
“You can make a difference,” Walker told more than two dozen women during a lunch-hour stop at My Sisters’ Place, a drop-in centre for women who don’t have a home or are at risk of homelessness.
[…]
“The homeless don’t vote and politicians are not interested in us because we don’t,” one woman told Walker.
Whatever. You figure it out, I’m busy.
Meanwhile, London’s favourite sauropod, the Board of Control, is all miffed at Tory Dianne Haskett because she won’t fill out one of their little questionairres:
That “startled” Controller Gord Hume.
“I’m disappointed,” he said. “Any federal politician who has the opportunity to stand up and fight for their municipality is missing a great opportunity to understand our issues and commit to helping this city.”
[…]
Haskett, a former London mayor, said she doesn’t respond to questionnaires, preferring to answer questions “with my own voice.”
Hey, Gordy, let me ask ya something: Seeing as how all you bozos on the Bored (which Joe Swan vowed to get rid of, until he ran for it 🙄 ) are about as useful as a third boob on a dying nun anyway, just why the hell should anybody, let alone a candidate in the middle of a race, waste their time on one of your little paperwork dog and pony shows? The only ones Haskett owes any kind of answers to are the voters and I don’t know about you, but I’m having a hard time finding somebody that doesn’t know where Dianne stands on most issues.
 Finally, my nomination for Grand Clanger du Campaign comes from none other than, you guessed it, Weird Willy Arlow again:
– Will Arlow of the Canadian Action Party wants north London to become “an airship terminus for the world.” He figures when fossil fuels run out in 50 to 70 years, only the very rich and the military will be able to afford travel by plane. The rest of us will travel by 300-kilometre-an-hour, lighter-than-air dirigibles. He wants London in on the ground floor by getting to work on the plan now. He says the project could tap expertise at the University of Western Ontario and lead to 6,500 new jobs.
Is it just me, or does anyone else suspect that ol’ Willy might be spending too much time outside without his tinfoil hat lately? 😆
Anyways… here’s today’s links:
The Freeps
Homelessness highlighted as growing national ‘crisis’
Campaign notebook
Students urged to use ‘bull detector’
May champions women’s issues
Haskett holdout miffs controllers
The Montreal Gazette
Two outsiders hope to join the opposition benches after Monday’s byelections
The Ottawa Sun
A vote for me is a vote tougher bail conditions, Haskett says
« Previous Page — Next Page »
|
