Archive for: May 2008
May 31, 2008
So, does anyone want to tell me just how many decades it will take us to deport this pervert?
Logman Pera didn’t know London police had followed him to the London park or that they knew he went there to meet a 12-year-old girl for sex.
He also didn’t know the girl he chatted with through Yahoo Messenger was an undercover London cyber cop.
This week, the 36-year-old Kurdish immigrant, in custody since his arrest in January after he was picked up when he was re-entering Canada from Iraq, was in court to be sentenced on luring and breaching his release conditions.
The officer, Const. Dale Howe took the nickname “Londongirrrl” and entered the chatroom, describing himself as a 12-year-old girl.
Howe had an unsolicited request from Logman2001can — Pera — for a private chat.
Fourteen minutes into the conversation, Pera asked Howe about having sex, meeting him and not telling.
Pera also invited Howe to view his Web camera. Howe saw a man nude from the waist down — not his face — and he was masturbating.
They agreed to meet the next day at a Burger King at Argyle Mall.
He told the officers it was “all the girl’s fault” because she called police and “I didn’t have sex with her.”
Pera was released a few days later — on May * — and didn’t show up for his next court appearance. [nice to see that revolving door working, isn’t it? -D] He was picked up on Jan. 11.
Ah, hell, waitaminit…. what the HELL am I thinking???? We don’t kick scumbags out of this country! We bust our backsides to BRING THEM IN…
May 30, 2008
And just what the heck is hippocrisy, you ask? Why, it’s hypocrisy the size of a hippopotamus, of course. 😛 And it can be damned amusing stuff.
Things like this remind me of Abe Lincoln. What the hell does Lincoln have to do with anything in present-day Canada? That’s easy: Lincoln once quipped that “Whenever I hear anyone arguing for slavery, I feel a strong impulse to see it tried on him personally.” I feel the same way about censorship; nothing improves my mood like seeing some totalitarian little bastard getting some of his own medicine rammed down his throat. A good example of this is one dorkette by the name of Gilary Massa. You can get a look at her here, on an episode of TVO’s The Agenda with Steve Paikin titled “Today’s Young Muslim Woman.”
What caught my attention (tip o’ the chapeau to Damian for this one) wasn’t her being a Muslim woman, however. To be honest, the first few times I read about her, the way the articles were worded, I thought she was a dude. No, what got my attention was the say she found her own guns pointed at her. Let’s start with the way that York U has stifled the debate on abortion by violating the rights of the pro-life side by banning all their groups:
Gilary Massa, vice-president external of the York Federation of Students, said student clubs will be free to discuss abortion in student space, as long as they do it “within a pro-choice realm,” and that all clubs will be investigated to ensure compliance.
“You have to recognize that a woman has a choice over her own body,” Ms. Massa said. “We think that these pro-life, these anti-choice groups, they’re sexist in nature … The way that they speak about women who decide to have abortions is demoralizing. They call them murderers, all of them do … Is this an issue of free speech? No, this is an issue of women’s rights.“
Hmm… A hijab-wearing Muslim woman who argues in favour of abortion. Didn’t see that one coming. 😯 A hijab-wearing Muslim woman who believes that the coercive power of the system should be used to shut up people she disagrees with? That’s a lot easier to picture.
Like Damian said; the minute somebody says “it’s not about free speech,” you can bet your ass it’s about free speech. And li’l Gilary obviously doesn’t like the idea of people being able to voice their opinions. Unless, of course, they happen to be her opinions; in which case, she becomes a free-speecher in one hell of a hurry!
Earlier this year, the McMaster University administration banned “anti-Zionist” organizations from using the term “Israeli Apartheid” in posters and banners on the campus. They gave their reasons, some I agree with and some I don’t. Do some digging and see for yourself.
But guess what? Massa got her bhurka all in a knot at the thought of being given a taste of her own medicine:
â€œWe think what has happened at McMaster is an attack on freedom of speech and the right for students to be able to organize,â€ […] â€œWe find it appalling that a university administration would strip students away of those fundamental rights without any consultation whatsoever. We think it sets a very scary precedent that other universities might follow.â€ […] â€œPeople should be allowed to have different opinions and try to convince each other and have a dialogue in a respectful manner. As student union representatives, we think that creating a safe space on campus means allowing people to use their freedom of speech, of course without being hateful or discriminatory. But they should also be able to use these words without fear of being clamped down on.â€
Yeah, right. Hypocritical bitch.
Whenever I hear anyone arguing for censorship, I feel a strong impulse to see her gagged with her own hijab.
May 29, 2008
Thanks to the Doggerel Party, I am giggling entirely too much.
TDPC researchers have investigated, and can report that no, they are not related. One is a megalomaniac bent on power, domination, harrassment of those less fortunate and money, while the other simply runs a power utility.
Ok, gotta go now. Need to pee… 😆
May 28, 2008
Here we go again.
In the frantic scramble to prove once again that socialists just won’t quit until they’re at the top of some heap or other — even if the heap in question is just being plain old bag-of-hammers stoopid — Arsehole Of The Universe Ubersocialist David Miller is still hopping on the Banned Wagon and is now screeching for a ban on handguns and all shooting ranges in TO. 🙄
Yup, that’s right; ol’ Davey never gets tired of scraping the bottom of the barrel of failed ideas. Look for him to ban farting in elevators next. Here’s a few tidbits, with arrangement and commentary by yours truly, of course:
Mayor David Miller announced a plan today that would make all handguns illegal in Toronto, a series of measures that will effectively shut down gun ranges and make it all but impossible to manufacture, assemble or store firearms within city limits.
â€œI want a safe city,â€ the mayor told reporters. â€œThe truth is, guns are too easily available and if you talk to some kids in some neighbourhoods they tell you they want a gun to protect themselves.â€™â€™ [Well, Dave, maybe if the scumbags that they want protection from were locked up, the idea of carrying a gun might never occur to these kids. Ever think of that??]
Among the recommendations is one calling on council to pass a zoning bylaw to restrict the use of firearms anywhere in the city, including firing ranges and gun clubs.
The report also calls for an end to all recreational shooting on city property, â€œspecifically, shooting ranges at the Don Montgomery Community Recreation Centre (former Mid-Scarborough Community Centre) and Union Station.â€ [Because everyone knows that shooting ranges are where all the gangbangers hang out.]
â€œAfter John Oâ€™Keefeâ€™s tragic killing I donâ€™t think thereâ€™s any defence for sport shooters any more,â€ he said. â€œItâ€™s a hobby that creates danger to others … Guns are stolen routinely from so-called legal owners.â€ [One legally owned handgun. So, naturally, we’ll blame the other 999,999 legally owned handguns that weren’t used in any crimes. Makes perfect sense, if you’re a socialist.]
â€œDo we as a society value safety or do we value a hobby that creates danger? And nobody can deny that that hobby directly results in people being shot to death on the streets of Toronto.â€ [Way to go with the “now that you’ve stopped beating your wife” question, Dave.]
Mr. Whitmore said the mayor is posturing to look as though he is addressing gun violence, but is doing nothing to stop the real source of illegal guns in Toronto.
â€œThis is about the mayorâ€™s need to be seen doing something about gun violence,â€ he said. â€œBut heâ€™s off on a complete tangent â€¦ the vast majority of guns being used by criminals in this city are coming from the United States. They certainly arenâ€™t coming from legitimate, law-abiding gun owners.â€
But in the meantime, Mr. Miller said the city must act. â€œIf we want a truly gun-free city we canâ€™t just ask the federal government to ban the ownership of hand guns … We have to do whatâ€™s in our power.â€
Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Don Valley East, scoffed at the mayorâ€™s handgun plan. â€œBig deal,â€ he said. â€œThe people that are using the guns are not going into stores and purchasing them. It helps marginally but in terms of reducing handguns Iâ€™m not sure it will do very much.â€ [That’s because it won’t do anything.]
In one six-week period in the summer of 2005, burglars reportedly made off with 84 firearms from Toronto area homes, according to a Toronto police survey. It includes 42 pistols stolen from the Coburg area. In October, 2005, a cache of 17 handguns was stolen from a Toronto lawyerâ€™s office. [Is anybody else wondering just how thieves knew where to find those nice, big collections? Did they maybe check one of those ammo sales records that Bob Rae thought were such a great idea?]
Global News also reported that Chris Bentley will suggest all imported guns be marked with the date they arrived in Canada, the name of the person or company who imported them and the place they were made. [Of course, more registry shit. That’s JUST what we need.]
Not everybody’s drinking the Koolaid. But is that really a surprise? I mean, come on, now. Even in a place like Toronto, it’s hard to get everybody to be as stupid as Miller…
Inspector Tony Cooper, of the Ontario Provincial Police, said there has only been one instance of a member of an Ontario shooting club using his handgun in a homicide.
â€œI hear about a lot of shootings in Toronto, but I havenâ€™t heard of any using target pistols,â€ said Insp. Cooper, the deputy chief firearms officer with the provincial weapons enforcement centre. â€œAnd only one by a member of a shooting club.â€
You can bet your ass that I’m not near done with this one. More when I have more time to work with (I’m off to buy some ammo)…
May 24, 2008
Layton has one.
No, really, I’m being serious here. For once (just this once), I’m saying something nice about Jack Layton and I’m not being a smartass: the man does, in fact, have a brain.
Granted, he doesn’t use it all that often, but he dusted it off and trotted it out the other day.
By now, just about everybody and their duck knows about Dion’s little Carbon Tax Excellent AdventureÂ©. Most of us were likely thinking (like I was) that Jumpin’ Jack!â„¢ would hop on that brain-dead bandwagon like a viagra addict on a $2 hooker, but he didn’t.Â Nope, not this time. Ol’ Jack actually came out with something eerily resembling common sense:
Ottawaâ€“A carbon tax would place an unfair burden on low-income Canadians, Jack Layton said yesterday.
“Those advocating a carbon tax suggest that by making the costs for certain things more expensive, people will make different choices,” Layton said.
“But Canada is a cold place and heating your home really isn’t a choice.”
How the hell did that happen??? Granted, he did get right back to the stoopid right quick (putting the screws to industry, blah blah blah; read the article), but he still had himself a good brain moment for a few seconds there.
Congrats, Jack. Go buy yourself a beer.
Next Page »
Of course, I did. And so did every other mean, nasty, homophobic, anti-multicultural, knuckle-dragging, islamophobic, intolerant, Christian, gun-totin’, pickup-drivin’, nascar-watchin’, intolerant, scaryscaryscary, rightwingrightwingrightwing, redneck neanderthal in the country.
We said that this would happen and all the “progressives” did was fling the ad hominem like a bunch of cranky caged apes with too much poop within reach. They called us every dirty name in the book and howled to the skies that “gay marriage” was not the thin edge of the wedge; it was about rights, nothing more. Well, as usual, the Fearmongering Of The Right Wing NutjobsÂ® has come to pass…
“Polygamy is happening in Toronto; it’s not common, but it’s happening,” said Hindy, imam at Salahuddin Islamic Centre.
Hindy, hardly a stranger to controversy, is well known for his friendship with the family of Omar Khadr, the young Canadian detainee at Guantanamo Bay, and his outspoken views on the implementation of Islamic law. In the past five years, Hindy said he has officiated or “blessed” more than 30 polygamous marriages; the most recent was two months ago. Even some imams in the GTA have second wives, he added.
“This is in our religion and nobody can force us to do anything against our religion,” he said. “If the laws of the country conflict with Islamic law, if one goes against the other, then I am going to follow Islamic law, simple as that.”
There you have it. Polygamy and another step towards the dhimmitude of Canada, all in one handy package. A two-fer. Nice, eh?
We said that this would happen. But still, the “progressives” who got us into this mess are playing dumb, pretending that they have no idea how such a thing could happen.Â I mean, how could we possibly have polygamy in Canada?? Wake up, shitheads; this isn’t happening because you let it happen, it’s happening because you made it happen!
Aw, now I’m probably gonna get called an islamophobe. Hey, it’s just their culture, it’s not hurting or screwing over anybody, right? Bullshit:
…Hindy advises men to keep the second marriage a secret as long as they can, even from the first wife. There have been instances where he has gone with the men to their homes to share the news with the first wives, in an attempt to help lessen the blow.
Hindy had advised Rigby’s husband to stay quiet. When Rigby emailed Hindy, soon after discovering he had conducted the marriage, he offered little support.
“You have to stand beside him in these difficult times. You should stop causing problems to him. You will not get anything by divorce except destroying your life,” she said he told her.
Well, at least they’re not trying to ram their ideals down anybody else’s throats, right? Wrong, again (by years, this time):
A controversial Toronto imam warned Public Safety Minister Anne McLellan at a closed-door meeting to stop “terrorizing” Canadian Muslims.”If you try to cross the line I can’t guarantee what is going to happen. Our young people, we can’t control,” Aly Hindy, the head of Scarborough’s Salaheddin Islamic Centre, recalls telling the minister at the May meeting she held in Toronto with dozens of Muslim leaders.
Translation: “We’re gonna do whatever the hell we want, and if you try to get in the way, we’re gonna run amok on your asses.”
Hey, “progressives,” I got a little message for ya. You might be thinking to yourselves, in the backs of your little pea brains, “when they come for me, who will be left to speak up?“Â And you know damned well that they will come for you.
The answer is that WE will be left. Mean, evil, gun-totin’ intolerant rednecks. We’ll be left because we don’t allow ourselves to be screwed with. When totalitarian assholes push us, we push back, and we aren’t afraid of escalation; we give as good as we get — usually better. And it’s not just because we have guns and know how to use them (although that’s always nice); it’s just who we are. We love our freedom, we understand that it isn’t free, and we’re willing to pay for it. No matter the price. So we’ll be the ones that are left to speak up.
Here’s the problem for you, though:
I can’t speak for everyone, so I’ll just speak for me. While I’ll be around to speak up, I won’t. Not for you. After all the damage you’ve done, I’ll be more than happy to leave you to the God damned wolves.
My kin, on the other hand, are safe. And they’re staying that way.